Commentary: Our new Cold War with China: Not like the old Cold War

Commentary: Our new Cold War with China: Not like the old Cold War

President Donald Trump, right, and Chinese Vice Premier Liu He participate in a signing ceremony of an initial trade deal at the White House in Washington, D.C., on January 15, 2020.

President Donald Trump, right, and Chinese Vice Premier Liu He participate in a signing ceremony of an initial trade deal at the White House in Washington, D.C., on January 15, 2020. (Yuri Gripas/Abaca Press/TNS)

Are the United States and China heading for a new Cold War? Judging by some of the rhetoric and policies emanating from Beijing and Washington, it sure looks that way.

Already tense, relations between the world's two largest powers have deteriorated sharply since the lethal coronavirus first emerged in the eastern Chinese city of Wuhan and then rapidly spread across the globe.

In the United States, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has led the charge. Last January, Pompeo called the Chinese Communist Party "the central threat of our times." And for weeks Pompeo sought to enlist America's partners and even the United Nations Security Council into condemning China for spreading the "Wuhan Virus."

China's rhetoric has been no less blistering. A foreign ministry spokesman falsely suggested that the virus might have originated in a U.S. Army lab. Beijing also rejected U.S. criticism of its early handling of the outbreak as "lunacy" and repeatedly blasted Pompeo as an "evil politician" and "enemy of humankind."

To be sure, some of the rhetorical grandstanding in Washington and Beijing is for domestic consumption.

President Donald Trump's increasingly bitter denunciation of China came not only after weeks of praising Beijing for its "transparency," "professionalism" and "very hard work," but also after it became clear that the administration's slow response had failed to stem a devastating outbreak at home. With just months to go until the elections, blaming China has become the president's go-to foil for his administration's own failures.

In China, too, blasting America provides useful cover for the leadership's early failure to respond to the virus in Wuhan, which not only overwhelmed the city but allowed the deadly disease to spread around the country and infect the world. And after stemming the spread through a brutal lockdown, Beijing's propaganda machine and "wolf warrior" diplomats have jumped into full gear to condemn all those who criticize China and laud President Xi Jinping's exemplary leadership.

Yet, at its core, the rhetorical competition represents a growing division between the United States and China. Washington has abandoned its long-standing view that a growing China could be integrated into a Western, U.S.-led world order. Even if few would go as far as Trump has in threatening "to cut off the whole relationship," there's widespread agreement in Washington that the competition with China for global power and influence should stand at the core of American foreign policy.

And China appears to be game. After decades practicing Deng Xiaoping's strategy to "hide your strength, bide your time, never take the lead," Beijing today is taking a more forceful and aggressive global stance. Under Xi, China not only rejects American global leadership; it seeks to replace it.

Economically, Xi has directed Chinese industry to lead the world in robotics, artificial intelligence, quantum computing and other high-tech fields by 2025. Militarily, China is modernizing rapidly, fielding the most advanced systems and increasingly showing off its military muscle around Taiwan, in the East and South China seas and throughout the Pacific. And politically, Beijing is trumpeting its own authoritarian system as a superior guide for others to follow.

U.S.-China competition is inevitable. It's what happens when a new power rises and begins to demand a greater say in shaping the future global order. But while history suggests that such competition often leads to confrontation, it by no means is inevitable.

And it isn't in this case. Compared with the U.S.-Soviet Cold War, the ideological competition between China and the United States is muted. Yes, there are clear divergences in terms of values and how best to govern, which are playing out in Hong Kong even now. But they aren't as deep and searing as the divisions of half a century ago.

For in stark contrast to then, the American and Chinese systems are far more intertwined economically, technologically, even socially. In some quarters, there is talk of decoupling the two economies, of bringing all production back home, as if all it takes is to fill a few pickups and drive home. But with deeply integrated markets and supply chains, separating the two economies will be wrenching and costly for all.

Most importantly, even as the pandemic has deepened divisions, it also has underscored the new reality of our world - that the most dire threats we now face, from deadly diseases to climate change, are truly global. Global threats require global solutions, based on cooperation rather than confrontation. There are no national solutions to these threats, only international ones.

The Cold War divided the world into two camps. But today, the rest of the world shows little interest is choosing sides. Rather, nations around the world want to work together to fight climate change and defeat a deadly pandemic. And they are looking to Washington and Beijing to cooperate and lead in these global efforts.



Ivo Daalder is president of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs and a former U.S. ambassador to NATO.

Visit the Chicago Tribune at


Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

This is how a thug acts. Twitter at long last has affixed fact-check links to a couple of tweets by President Donald Trump that include verifiably false details, in this case claims by the president that mail-in balloting leads to election fraud. Note that Twitter didn't remove the tweets, and hasn't gone so far as to add fact-check links to the president's baseless insinuations that MSNBC ...

It has often occurred to me that the appropriate response to some of the ridiculous things President Donald Trump utters is: "He's an idiot." Don't get me wrong (as op-ed writers like to say). I'm not impugning Trump's IQ. By "idiot" I mean something a bit different: that Trump often doesn't know what he's talking about. (That doesn't exclude the possibility that some of his misrepresentations ...

In mid-April, I received a message from the nursing home in Connecticut where my mother lives. When I called back, a doctor told me, "your mother has a fever." Those were words I'd been dreading and expecting. "We assume it's COVID," the doctor said. My 80-year-old mother was comfortable for the time being. Her fever wasn't very high and she was breathing okay. But the doctor said not to take ...

If there is a silver lining to the flawed U.S. response to the coronavirus pandemic, it is this: The relatively high number of new cases being diagnosed daily - upward of 20,000 - will make it easier to test new vaccines. To determine whether a vaccine prevents disease, the study's subjects need to be exposed to the pathogen as it circulates in the population. Reopening the economy will likely ...

You have to hand it to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey: He may have been lured into an unwinnable election-year fight with President Donald Trump, but at least he's still throwing punches. Shortly before 1 a.m. EDT Friday, Trump verbally barreled into the hot flaming mess on the ground in Minneapolis, where protests over the death of George Floyd had turned violent. A bystander's video shows an ...

"You are the most selfish (expletive) people on the planet." I jerked my head to the left, where I saw a neighbor glaring at us from his driveway while unloading groceries from his trunk. "Where's your (expletive) mask?" he said. "Unbelievable." My jaw dropped. I had just walked three blocks home with my toddler and my dad in our mostly empty Los Angeles neighborhood because my kid had thrown ...

My junior and senior years in high school were 1968 and 1969; five decades later, I can still remember some of the main events of that era: the assassinations of Martin Luther King and Robert F. Kennedy, the bombing of Cambodia, the Apollo 8 spaceflight that orbited the moon, and Woodstock, which I pleaded with my parents to let me attend. (They said no.) In my personal life, I remember ...

This is a solemn and challenging time in the life of our nation and world. A remorseless, invisible enemy threatens the elderly and vulnerable among us - and some of the healthiest, too. It challenges our sense of safety, security and community. Our children are separated from their teachers and their friends in a way that is hard for them to understand. Many have lost loved ones, jobs and ...

California and 22 other states are taking the Trump administration to court - again - in an attempt to block President Donald Trump's foolishly destructive effort to weaken fuel economy standards. Since he took office, Trump has been on a mission to roll back the Obama-era fuel efficiency regulation that was the nation's most important effort to cut automobile pollution, reduce oil consumption ...

Imagine if you killed somebody on your job, and all you got that day was fired. You go into work the next day, return the keycard you swipe every morning when you get on the elevator, pack the things from your desk, toss out whatever food you have in the pantry refrigerator and say goodbye to your co-workers before two security guards escort you out of the building. And, let's just say this ...

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News