Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit

Funt: NBC's debatable debate coverage

  • Updated
  • 0
Peter Funt

Peter Funt

Among the losers in the Democrats’ opening presidential debate was NBC News.

Faced with an unmanageable number of candidates, an awkward format, and miscast moderators—not to mention serious technical glitches—the network took a difficult situation and made it worse.

Lester Holt, NBC’s highest ranking journalist, was forced to split time in the opening hour with Savannah Guthrie and Jose Diaz-Balart.

Then, after all three were replaced mid-debate by Rachel Maddow and Chuck Todd, Holt was relegated to standing in the audience for a few seconds to read from social media.

It underscored how poorly NBC managed its talent roster as well as the folly of using viewer questions in a presidential debate—the first night from “John in New York,” the second night from “Kathleen in Oregon.”

NBC’s most egregious unforced error was in failing to establish cohesiveness in the moderators’ questions.

For example, Guthrie’s opening query to Elizabeth Warren concerned Warren’s legislative agenda, but Guthrie’s first question to Cory Booker was about, of all things, Sen. Warren’s position on breaking up big corporations.

With 10 candidates and limited time for each, cornering one candidate right out of the box with a question about his opponent was inappropriate.

At another point Wednesday the candidates were engaged in a lively exchange about gun rights.

Yet, Maddow abruptly changed the subject to the Supreme Court, prompting Sen. Booker and Mayor Bill de Blasio to ignore her and address the gun issue anyway.

The moderators’ failure to curb interruptions by de Blasio and a few others the first night predictably led to an even more undisciplined display on night two.

Thursday’s first half hour was so chaotic—Sen. Harris called it a “food fight”—that after 27 minutes social activist Marianne Williamson had still not uttered a word.

As in any debate, moderators needed a pre-game strategy for the style of questions: Would they be general (“How would you secure the border with Mexico?”) or would they be pointedly aimed at the record of each candidate?

For the most part, the questions were generic, yet after Rep. Tulsi Gabbard waited patiently for a chance to speak, Chuck Todd took an odd turn and asked her to defend a remark she once made concerning gay rights.

Such scattershot questioning pushed the already-strained first night off the rails.

Similarly on Thursday candidates were asked a generic questions until, at the start of the second hour, Maddow pointedly asked Pete Buttigieg about his handling of the recent shooting of a black man by a white cop in South Bend, Indiana.

A fair question? Yes, but only if all candidates were likewise put on the spot.

Joe Biden, for example, wasn’t asked by moderators about his recent comments concerning collaborating with segregationist colleagues in the Senate—it only came up when Sen. Harris confronted Biden about it.

In its self-promotional quest to represent its various news units—NBC News, MSNBC, The “Today” show, “Meet the Press” and Telemundo—NBC managed to leave one of its best players, Brian Williams, on the sidelines for pre- and post-debate analysis.

Williams, a veteran who shines in this type of special coverage, was demoted four years ago after twisting facts his role in covering news stories.

He currently anchors the 11 p.m. ET hour but no longer gets the big network assignments.

NBC’s decision to crowd the moderators desk was driven by marketing and promotional considerations.

Its five hosts were in an untenable situation, seeking to be fair but tough, and thorough yet brief, while herding 20 cats.

Taking stock after the second night, Ms. Maddow had an answer that was better than any of her questions.

Moderating such an event was, she conceded, “not a thing that humans can do, and we should never do it again.”

Syndicated columnist Peter Funt can be reached at www.CandidCamera.com.

0 Comments
0
0
0
0
0

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Stubson writes: This past weekend the Wyoming GOP held its quarterly State Central Committee meeting, the outcome of which was a flurry of asinine resolutions best characterized as clubby playground tattling. The Central Committee’s actions also thrust my party into the national dialogue as the latest example of political party dysfunction.

Hunkins writes: It wasn’t far into my routine before I forgot breakfast and sat down to listen and watch Lamb’s fascinating interview with a newly elected representative to the Virginia House of Delegates, a young, articulate and conservative Black woman from Norfolk, Virginia.

Barron writes: 

The ballot item failed by only 116 votes in an election where voters passed every thing else including $10 million for a new senior center. The total approved menu called for spending $128 million for 13 propositions and more than 60 projects.

Adler writes: The Court cut the ground from beneath its landmark ruling with a wounding declaration that the president enjoys a “limited” executive privilege: “The privilege is fundamental to the operation of Government and inextricably rooted in the separation of powers under the Constitution.”

Rudkin writes: 

I can’t help but make the connection between this place and what God does in the hearts and minds of those who choose to trust him. God has always been in the business of restoring, taking hearts that are bone tired, skeptical, broken down by the cares of this life and breathing beauty into them again.

The Washington, D.C.-based Federal Bureau of Investigation has lost all credibility as a disinterested investigatory agency. Now we learn from…

I love Thanksgiving. I love preparing the food all day and enjoying it while sitting around a table with some of the people I love most. And t…

Rancher Shelagh Wulff Wisdom writes: Something transpires that changes everything when you become a devotee of horses. Priorities change their focus. You want to provide everything to that animal that he needs. You start to become a part of that horse at the very same time he starts becoming a part of you.

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News