Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
spotlight AP

The Utterly Moderate podcast: Understanding Recent Climate Change News (with James Gerber)

  • 0

In America, we talk so much about freedom as it is a central part of our identity.

When it comes to what freedom entails, most Americans would agree that there are political, social, and economic dimensions. Most agree that in a free society there is a need for order, justice, security, opportunity, and fairness. There is a shared sense that freedom requires the absence of harm and undue interference. Most believe that freedom requires a variety of rights, including those related to speech, property, voting, religion, fair legal treatment, assembly, the press, and so on.  

One important thing to remember in these conversations is not just to focus on being free from something, but free to do something as well. Being free from tyranny does not necessarily mean the conditions exist which allow you to live a full life. That freedom requires not merely the absence of something but the presence of something as well.

Climate change might be seen as a threat to the freedom and well-being of not only all Americans living today, but for their children and grandchildren, since greenhouse gas emissions can be locked into the atmosphere for generations.

The sooner we act, the less damage there will be to our society and to Earth’s ecosystems and the lower the economic cost.

There has been a lot about climate change in the news lately, with the release of the recent IPCC assessment and COP26 in Glasgow.

To help us understand this, Dr. James Gerber joins the Utterly Moderate Podcast.

Gerber is the co-director and lead scientist of the Global Landscapes Initiative (GLI) at the Institute on the Environment at the University of Minnesota.

After listening to this episode, make sure to explore climate solutions at Project Drawdown or climate research at the AAAS.

You can subscribe to this podcast at Apple PodcastsGoogle Podcasts and Spotify.

Two reasonable social scientists, Dr. Alison Dagnes and Dr. Lawrence Eppard, analyze important topics by clearing away politics, opinions, and ideologies to get to the facts.

0 Comments
0
0
0
0
0

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Dodson writes:

Wyoming has the land mass to support more than a single 345-megawatt nuclear energy plant near Kemmerer, and the state needs to make it abundantly clear to the industry that it wants to expand that number and position itself as the Silicon Valley for nuclear power.

Stubson writes: This past weekend the Wyoming GOP held its quarterly State Central Committee meeting, the outcome of which was a flurry of asinine resolutions best characterized as clubby playground tattling. The Central Committee’s actions also thrust my party into the national dialogue as the latest example of political party dysfunction.

Barron writes: 

The leadership voted to remove Bray’s name from a draft resolution that rebuked him and to rewrite it into a condemnation of State Rep Steve Harshman of Casper and State Sen. Larry Hicks of Baggs.

If just 25% of our community members pledge to spend $100 with local businesses from November through the end of the holiday season in December — that would be $2 million in gross sales of which $1.36 million would stay in our community.

This year marks the 25th anniversary of one of the most spectacular conservation victories in recent history: the defeat of a massive gold mine planned for the doorstep of Yellowstone National Park.

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News